Documentation of informed consent in the patient’s chart is important from a number of perspectives: health care ethics, malpractices risk management, and effective patient management. The most important goal of informed consent is that the patient has an opportunity to be an informed participant in health care decision making. It is generally accepted that complete informed consent should be obtained from patients before carrying out any diagnostic or therapeutic procedure and includes a discussion of the following elements:
Informed consent is the process by which fully informed patients can participate in choices about their health care. It originates from the legal and ethical right each patient has to direct what happens to their body and from the ethical duty of the physician to involve the patient in his or her health care. Fully informed patients have adequate foreknowledge or understanding of the recommended treatment and/or diagnostic testing, the anticipated outcomes and alternatives to it. It is the process of effectively communicating with patients in terms they understand, and then allowing them the opportunity to ask questions.
Malpractice Risk Management
Despite our best efforts as careful clinicians to do what is right, bad outcomes do happen. In an informed consent process, the potential risks of an adverse outcome are dealt with up front with each patient in a straight-forward and non-threatening manner. Having this conversation with patients first helps a great deal in those unlikely cases with a less-than-optimum outcome. What is more, patients who have access to open information exchanges are less likely to sue for malpractice.
To protect yourself in malpractice litigation, in addition to carrying adequate liability insurance, it is important that communication about the informed consent process itself be documented in the clinical file. Good documentation can serve as evidence in a court of the law that the process indeed took place. A timely and thorough documentation in the patient’s chart by the provider of the treatment can be a strong piece of evidence that the provider engaged the patient in an appropriate discussion.
Of the complaints that we receive at CHP, the most common is “the practitioner hurt me.” Often the patient goes on to describe an uncomfortable procedure (adjusting, massage, acupuncture needles) followed by post-treatment soreness, stiffness or other symptoms. The perception of an uninformed patient in this scenario boils down to “That practitioner hurt me.” and CHP gets a complaint. A complete “informed consent” discussion with that patient acknowledging the risk of discomfort with the procedure and the potential of post-treatment soreness may well have prevented this perception and prevented a complaint.
Informed patients make better health care decisions. Open discussion with patients about treatment plans, common alternative treatments that may be available, the risks that may be associated with them, including refusing care, and invitation to patients to ask questions and receive clarification are primary activities for all health care providers. Often dubbed the “PARQ” conference (an acronym for “procedures, alternatives, risks, and questions”), this open communication empowers each patient to obtain all necessary information, ask questions and to collaborate with the clinician in making decisions about care.
Patients who are able to make informed decisions are more likely to follow through on your treatment recommendations. They have demonstrably better clinical outcomes, are more satisfied with you and your care and they are more likely to refer their family and friends.
Want more information on record keeping or other best practices for integrative healthcare providers? Search “best practices” on this site to read more in this series of articles.